fbpx

US Customs Laboratory Methods for THC (2000)

11 pages. Cut-off = 1 ppm THC, which is why DEA’s 2001 Interpretive Rule legalizing all Hemp products meant “‘no THC’ = 1 ppm”, thus HIA v DEA 1 and 2 were unnecessary and an intentional mis-reading of DEA’s Interpretive Rule, greatly hurting the industry. Yes, HIA asked for DEA’s opinion on the legality of hemp products, after due deliberation DEA decided to legalize all hemp products, then HIA sued DEA for it.

Download
বাংলা简体中文繁體中文EnglishFrançaisDeutschहिन्दीItaliano日本語한국어मराठीPortuguêsਪੰਜਾਬੀРусскийEspañolSvenskaతెలుగుไทยTürkçeУкраїнськаTiếng Việt